نقشه راه به انگلیسی

Chapter 1: Introduction & Context

1.1 Introduction

Since the 1979 revolution, the Islamic Republic of Iran has maintained a theocratic authoritarian regime in which power is highly centralized, with ultimate authority vested in the Supreme Leader and reinforced by the Guardian Council. This governance model has created a resilient political structure that restricts reform efforts and concentrates decision-making within a narrow circle of unelected elites (Takeyh 2009). Although periodic calls for reform have emerged, meaningful structural changes have consistently faced obstacles, resulting in a deeply entrenched system resistant to democratization. However, recent public uprisings reflect an escalating demand for a democratic shift, with Iranians increasingly seeking a system that respects political freedoms and human rights (Alamdari 2005).

In response to this demand, this paper introduces a new democratic constitution crafted to serve as a foundation for a democratic Iran. This constitution prioritizes human rights, inclusivity, and economic prosperity, and is aimed at creating a stable and representative governance structure for future generations. Alongside introducing the new constitution, the paper presents a comprehensive, phased roadmap to transition from Iran’s current authoritarian framework to this democratic model. The roadmap emphasizes inclusivity, reconciliation, and adherence to the rule of law, ensuring all Iranians have a meaningful role in shaping the nation’s future.

Recognizing Iran’s unique socio-political landscape, the plan also prioritizes engagement with influential groups, particularly business elites and the Iranian armed forces, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), or Sepah. Though not officially part of the government, business elites hold substantial economic influence due to their connections with state institutions, making them essential stakeholders in the reform process (Keshavarzian 2007). The IRGC, as a military and economic powerhouse with deep ideological ties to the current regime, holds significant sway over Iran’s political landscape; their cooperation or at least neutrality will be essential for a peaceful transition (Buchta 2000; H. E. Chehabi 1991). In addition, Iranian diaspora can provide tremendous help in offering financial resources, technical expertise, and political influence crucial for a democratic transition (Hakimzadeh 2006; Ghorashi 2003).

The roadmap presented in this paper thus offers a structured approach for inclusive engagement, involving government officials, opposition leaders, civil society, business elites, diaspora, and the armed forces in a collaborative transition towards the new democratic constitution. By addressing domestic and international incentives, the plan highlights the regional stability and economic prosperity that a democratic Iran could provide, encouraging support from global powers (Gheissari and Nasr 2009). This approach aims not only to dismantle authoritarian structures but also to establish a stable, democratic future in Iran that resonates with the aspirations of its people and fulfills the demands for transformative change.

The proposed roadmap for a peaceful constitutional transition in Iran requires an understanding of the socio-political forces at play, particularly within the existing constitutional framework, and the roles of influential groups such as business elites and the armed forces. This background provides essential context for the complexities involved in addressing the entrenched power structures within Iran’s governance and economy, underscoring the need for an inclusive approach to democratization.

1.2 Current Constitutional Framework

Iran’s constitution, established in 1979 and amended in 1989, reflects a hybrid model that incorporates democratic elements underpinned by theocratic authority. While it includes provisions for elected institutions, the ultimate power resides in unelected bodies that ensure strict adherence to the principles of the Islamic Republic (Takeyh 2009). The Supreme Leader holds overarching authority across all branches of government—executive, legislative, and judicial—exerting control over key political and religious decisions (Chehabi 1991). Furthermore, the Guardian Council, which vets parliamentary legislation and election candidates, serves as a powerful gatekeeper that restricts political participation and maintains the ideological alignment of state policies with theocratic values (Parsa 2016). This concentration of authority in unelected bodies has fostered an environment resistant to democratic reform, effectively limiting political pluralism and reinforcing the dominance of the ruling elite.

Understanding Iran’s transformation requires a close examination of the socio-political forces at work. This section now includes an analysis of how historical legacies, economic challenges, and international pressures converge to create both barriers and opportunities for democratic change. The interplay between longstanding institutional rigidity and emergent public activism sets the stage for the transition detailed in later chapters.

Chapter 2: Key Roles in Transition

2.1 The Role of Business Elites

A significant yet informal force in Iran’s socio-economic landscape is the class of business elites, who have capitalized on the existing system to accumulate wealth and influence. While they are not formally integrated into the governmental structure, these elites maintain extensive connections with political figures, allowing them to navigate Iran’s complex regulatory environment and secure lucrative business opportunities, particularly in sectors like trade, real estate, and import-based industries (Keshavarzian 2007). Their economic power and political alliances enable them to exert substantial influence over Iran’s economy and policymaking. As a result, any democratic transition will require strategic engagement with these business elites, who could either support the transition by lending economic stability or resist it to protect their vested interests (Alamdari 2005).

2.2 The Role of the Iranian Armed Forces, IRGC, and Paramilitary Groups

Iran’s armed forces consist of the conventional military, known as the Artesh, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), or Sepah, which was established following the 1979 revolution. Unlike the Artesh, which primarily focuses on national defense, the IRGC plays a central role in Iran’s political and economic spheres, wielding influence that extends far beyond military affairs. The IRGC’s involvement in various sectors, including defense, construction, telecommunications, and energy, has transformed it into a critical stakeholder with a vested interest in the current regime’s stability (Buchta 2000; Gheissari and Nasr 2009). Given its substantial economic assets and ideological commitment to the Islamic Republic’s foundational principles, the IRGC’s position will be pivotal in any peaceful transition. Addressing the concerns of the IRGC and establishing frameworks that respect its economic interests while fostering a more democratic governance structure is essential for minimizing resistance and ensuring a stable transition (H. E. Chehabi 1991).

Additionally, the regime employs goons, gangsters, and thugs—often recruited from marginalized groups—to enforce crowd control, violently suppress protests, and instill fear among demonstrators. These individuals, lacking formal training but granted impunity, escalate repression with unchecked brutality (Khatam 2023; Bayat 2013)). The Basij militia, known for deploying such tactics, has played a key role in violently suppressing movements like the 2009 Green Movement and 2022 protests (Ghobadzadeh 2014; Dabiri 2023). Addressing this requires:

Legal Accountability: Ensuring that those engaging in violence face judicial consequences in a democratic transition.
Demobilization & Reintegration: Offering alternative economic opportunities to deter reliance on state-backed repression.
Security Sector Reform: Establishing professional law enforcement under democratic oversight to prevent further abuse.

2.3 The Role of the Iranian Diaspora

The Iranian diaspora, estimated at over 4–5 million people, plays a critical role in shaping Iran’s economic, political, and cultural future. Spread across North America, Europe, and the Middle East, Iranian expatriates are deeply involved in business, academia, human rights advocacy, and media, offering financial resources, technical expertise, and political influence crucial for a democratic transition (Hakimzadeh 2006; Ghorashi 2003).

Key contributions of the Iranian diaspora include:

Economic and Investment Potential: Iranian expatriates control billions in assets and run successful businesses globally. Mobilizing diaspora investment can stabilize Iran’s economy during the transition, mitigating capital flight and rebuilding financial institutions (Naficy 1993).
Political Advocacy and Soft Power: Many Iranian diaspora communities actively lobby Western governments and international organizations for human rights and democratic reforms in Iran. Their role in media, policymaking, and think tanks helps shape global perceptions and influence foreign policy (Kadivar 2021).
Technology and Knowledge Transfer: Iran’s exiled scientists, engineers, and academics offer critical expertise to modernize infrastructure, education, and governance systems in a post-authoritarian Iran (Khosravi 2017).
Social Mobilization and Media Influence: Iranian journalists, filmmakers, and activists in exile have created independent Persian-language media platforms such as BBC Persian, Iran International, and Manoto TV, countering state propaganda and keeping Iranians informed about democratic movements (Naficy 2012).
Financial and Humanitarian Support: During past uprisings, the diaspora has provided financial support to families of political prisoners, activists, and protest victims, ensuring continued resistance against repression (Ansari 2019).

2.4 The Need for Transition

Iran Iran faces significant socio-economic challenges, including persistent economic hardships, international sanctions, and widespread public dissatisfaction with the existing system. High inflation, unemployment, and reduced purchasing power have eroded public trust in the government and exacerbated calls for reform (Takeyh 2009). International sanctions, particularly targeting Iran’s vital oil and energy sectors, have further constrained economic growth and contributed to growing frustration among the population. Additionally, limitations on political freedoms and human rights abuses, combined with economic inequalities fueled by crony capitalism and the extensive influence of the IRGC, highlight the urgent need for a democratic transition (Parsa 2016). By addressing these systemic issues and promoting an inclusive framework, a constitutional transition toward democracy offers a pathway to a more equitable and prosperous future for Iran’s citizens, while aligning with the broader aspirations for political and social transformation (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010).

The newly crafted democratic constitution introduced in this paper seeks to fulfill these aspirations by dismantling authoritarian structures and establishing a foundation for a stable, rights-based governance model that resonates with the public’s demand for change.

Chapter 3: Uprisings and the Demand for Change

In the last two decades, Iran has experienced a series of major public uprisings driven by economic grievances, political dissatisfaction, and demands for personal freedoms. These movements reflect a deep-rooted discontent with the current political system and highlight the Iranian people’s increasing desire for democratic reforms. This section explores key uprisings that underscore the population’s enduring call for accountability, transparency, and societal change.

3.1 The 2009 Green Movement

The Green Movement, which emerged after the disputed presidential election of June 2009, marked a turning point in Iran’s modern political history. Alleging widespread electoral fraud in favor of incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad over reformist candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi, millions of Iranians took to the streets, engaging in the largest public demonstrations since the 1979 revolution. These protests, characterized by calls for electoral transparency and respect for the popular vote, underscored the public’s demand for accountability within the political system (Keshavarzian 2007).

Despite facing a brutal government crackdown—characterized by arrests, violence, and strict media censorship—the Green Movement brought several significant elements to the forefront:

Public Demand for Accountability: Protesters called for fair elections and transparency, expressing a desire for a government that represents the will of the people.
Role of Civil Society: Activists, intellectuals, and ordinary citizens were mobilized, indicating a growing willingness among Iranians to advocate for political reform.
Use of Technology: For the first time, Iranians widely employed social media and digital communication to organize protests and share information, ushering in a new era of digital activism that would influence future movements (Rahimi 2011).

The Green Movement, although suppressed, revealed a strong undercurrent of dissent and set the stage for subsequent protests, making clear the Iranian public’s aspiration for democratic reforms and greater personal freedoms.

3.2 Subsequent Protests

Protests in 2017–2018 and 2019 underscored socio-economic frustrations and demands for broader political reforms (Khatam 2023; Shaterabadi, Jirdehi, and Amiri 2022). Each wave was met with government crackdowns, revealing persistent dissatisfaction across varied demographic and geographic segments. These uprisings, though not always directly linked, reflect a persistent public dissatisfaction with the regime and the socio-economic conditions in the country.

2017-2018 Protests: A period of high unemployment, inflation, and economic stagnation triggered protests across Iran, expanding beyond Tehran to smaller cities and towns. Although initially driven by economic concerns, these demonstrations soon included calls for broader political reforms, highlighting a widespread dissatisfaction with the government’s performance.
2019 Fuel Price Protests: A sudden and severe increase in fuel prices led to mass protests, met with a forceful government response, including widespread casualties and an internet shutdown to curtail communication among protesters. The government’s heavy-handed approach underscored its reluctance to address public grievances, exacerbating public anger and signaling a widening rift between the regime and the populace.

These protests underscore a growing discontent among various segments of Iranian society, suggesting a heightened willingness to confront the regime despite the risks.

3.3 The Women, Life, Freedom Movement

The death of Mahsa Amini in September 2022, following her detention by the morality police for allegedly violating Iran’s compulsory hijab laws, ignited one of the most significant uprisings in recent Iranian history. The movement, popularly known by the slogan “Women, Life, Freedom,” has become a powerful symbol of resistance against gender-based restrictions and broader societal repression (Dabiri 2023).

Gender Equality Demands: The movement has galvanized women, particularly young women, who are challenging restrictive laws and advocating for gender equality.
Youth Participation: A substantial portion of protesters comprises young Iranians, frustrated by social restrictions and limited economic opportunities, who are increasingly vocal in their demands for social and political freedoms.
Cultural Resistance: The protests reflect widespread opposition to enforced cultural and religious norms, calling for increased personal freedoms and cultural autonomy.

The government’s harsh response, including mass arrests and international condemnation, has not quelled the movement. The persistence and scale of the demonstrations indicate a profound shift in public willingness to confront the regime, marking a pivotal moment in Iran’s socio-political landscape.

Chapter 4: Implications for the Transition

This section now includes an analysis of how these protests have eroded the regime’s legitimacy and created a fertile environment for democratic reform. The mobilization capacity demonstrated in these movements is highlighted as a key factor that, if harnessed within a structured transition plan, could significantly accelerate the shift toward democracy.

Widespread protests and evolving digital public spheres (e.g., Clubhouse discussions by Iranians at home and abroad) show declining regime legitimacy and a robust civil society. This heightened visibility may shape international engagement (Izadi and Dryden 2024). The recent uprisings in Iran reveal critical elements essential for a successful transition to a democratic framework:

Erosion of Legitimacy: Persistent protests have weakened the government’s legitimacy, intensifying the need for reform (Gheissari and Nasr 2009).
Mobilization Capacity: Civil society’s resilience and organizational ability suggest that a grassroots democratic movement is viable and impactful, especially if integrated into a structured transition (Gheissari and Nasr 2009).
International Attention: The global spotlight in Iran, particularly through movements like “Women, Life, Freedom,” has raised awareness of Iranian calls for reform. This attention could shape international engagement strategies, aligning them with Iranian aspirations for change (Keshavarzian, 2007; Parsa, 2016).
Need for Inclusive Solutions: Addressing grievances requires a comprehensive plan that includes political, economic, and social reforms. An inclusive approach will ensure that the transition aligns with the public’s diverse needs and aspirations (Keshavarzian, 2007; Parsa, 2016).

These factors underscore the necessity of a transition plan that reflects public demands and lays a sustainable foundation for democratic governance.(Gheissari and Nasr 2009; Keshavarzian 2007).

4.1 The Willingness of Key Elites

Peaceful democratic transitions often hinge on elite negotiations (Higley and Burton 1989). Scholars of democratic transitions emphasize that elite bargaining is central to peaceful regime change (Higley and Burton 1989). Powerful clerics, IRGC leaders, or business figures might accept peaceful reforms if they trust their core interests will be safeguarded (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986). The plan offers amnesty for nonviolent acts and legal protections for assets, aiming to incentivize elite endorsement of a “Poland-style” negotiated transition.

4.2 Objectives of the Transition Plan

The proposed transition plan for Iran aims to create a democratic framework that addresses the country’s complex social, political, and economic challenges. The following objectives serve as the foundation for a comprehensive and peaceful shift toward democracy:

Establish a Democratic Government
Ensure Peaceful Transition
Promote Inclusivity and diversity
Strengthen Rule of Law
Foster Economic Prosperity
Foster Respectful and Constructive Relations with the World

4.3 Evolving Regional and Domestic Context (2023–2025)

Recent geopolitical developments have significantly altered Iran’s strategic landscape:

Hamas’s Attack on Israel and Aftermath: On October 7, 2023, Hamas initiated a large-scale assault on Israel, prompting an extensive and forceful military response from the Israeli Defense Forces. This retaliation resulted in significant destruction across the Gaza Strip, exacerbating the already fragile humanitarian situation in the region. While the immediate conflict centered on the hostilities between Israel and Hamas, its impact extended far beyond, influencing geopolitical dynamics across the Middle East. In particular, the situation drew attention to the stability of Iran’s regional alliances, as various actors reassessed their positions amid the escalating violence. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) conducted a thorough analysis of these developments, highlighting a considerable surge in violent incidents associated with the Israel-Hezbollah conflict in the aftermath of the attack. Their findings underscore the broader ramifications of the conflict, pointing to rising tensions and potential vulnerabilities within Iran’s strategic partnerships, which may have long-term implications for the region’s security landscape (Byman, Jones, and Palmer 2024).
Weakening of Iranian Proxies: Following the 2023 hostilities, Israel’s sustained military operations have substantially weakened Hamas in Gaza and, to an extent, Hezbollah in Lebanon. While both groups remain operational, they have been “neutralized” to a degree not previously seen. Consequently, Iran’s regional influence—bolstered by these proxies in the past 40 years—now faces new constraints (Mahmood 2024; Saraswat 2024).
Houthi Forces in Yemen: Traditionally viewed as an Iranian proxy, They have undergone significant changes in its strategic positioning. In April 2022, a UN-brokered truce led to a reduction in hostilities, allowing for fuel imports into Houthi-controlled regions and limited flights from Sanaa International Airport. This ceasefire, while fragile, has endured, contributing to a decrease in direct military leverage for Tehran in the region. Analysts have noted that the Houthis’ reliance on Iranian support may diminish as they gain economic self-sufficiency, potentially reducing Iran’s influence over the group (ACRP 2024). This evolution highlights a potential decline in Iran’s capacity to project power through non-state actors in the Middle East.
Increased Domestic Criticism: Inside Iran, daily Clubhouse Application discussion groups openly criticize the regime’s 46-year rule. While freedom of expression remains restricted in other media, the relative openness of these online forums reveals a notable level of discontent and public willingness to speak out. This growing chorus of critical voices, including those located within Iran, signals deepening dissatisfaction with the status quo (Izadi and Dryden 2024).
Calls for U.S. Negotiation with the United States: Following the U.S. presidential inauguration on January 20, 2025, and the return of Donald Trump to power, multiple voices within Iran have advocated for renewed talks with Washington. These calls reflect a pragmatic recognition that a weakened network of proxies, combined with mounting economic pressures, may leave Tehran seeking a détente or negotiated agreement to stabilize its position (Hafezi 2025).

Overall, these developments present both opportunities and obstacles for a potential democratic transition. On one hand, the diminishing utility of regional proxies and heightened domestic criticism could motivate sections of Iran’s leadership to consider reforms or negotiations. On the other hand, the state may respond with increased security measures to reassert control, complicating any transition roadmap. Consequently, any peaceful, phased shift toward democracy must account for this evolving context, ensuring that strategies for elite engagement, economic stabilization, and external relations are adaptable to rapidly changing regional dynamics.

Chapter 5: Comparative Perspectives on Transition

To address the broader context of democratization, this section examines Iran’s potential democratic transition in comparison with other nations that have undergone similar processes. By analyzing successful and unsuccessful transitions globally, we aim to extract lessons applicable to Iran’s unique sociopolitical landscape. This comparative analysis section builds on theories of pacted transitions (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986) and the role of civil society in democratization (R. Putnam 1994) and seeks to identify key strategies and mechanisms from comparative cases that can inform Iran’s transition roadmap.

5.1 Eastern Europe: Poland’s Negotiated Transition

Poland’s transition from communism to democracy in 1989 remains a pivotal example of negotiated political change. The Round Table Talks, a series of discussions between government officials and the Solidarity opposition movement, established a framework for semi-free elections and ultimately dismantled the authoritarian regime. This transition highlights the crucial role of civil society, inclusive dialogue, and elite negotiation in achieving peaceful democratization (Kinowska-Mazaraki 2021; Bielasiak 2010; Petrova 2012).

5.1.1 Lessons for Iran:

Inclusive Dialogue and Elite Bargaining: The Polish Round Table Talks exemplify the importance of structured negotiations involving opposition leaders and government representatives. This aligns with theories of pacted transitions, which emphasize elite collaboration as a mechanism for democratization (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986). For Iran, engaging key stakeholders, including reformist factions within the regime, opposition leaders, and influential civil society actors, can create a viable path forward.
Empowerment of Civil Society: The Solidarity movement showcased how a robust civil society, even under repressive conditions, can mobilize citizens and advocate for change (R. Putnam 1994). While Iran’s civil society is constrained by its theocratic framework, grassroots movements like “Women, Life, Freedom” demonstrate its potential. Building alliances across diverse societal groups could replicate Solidarity’s cohesive influence.
Challenges of Legacy and Political Cohesion: Poland’s post-transition period revealed challenges in sustaining democratic cohesion, as political fragmentation and disputes over Solidarity’s legacy occasionally hindered progress (Kinowska-Mazaraki 2021). Iran’s transition must anticipate similar risks by fostering unity among opposition groups and creating adaptable democratic values that accommodate ideological diversity.

5.1.2 Unique Challenges for Iran

Unlike Poland’s transition from a communist regime, Iran operates within a theocratic framework that intertwines religious authority with political power. This structural difference complicates the role of civil society and elite negotiations, as religious institutions hold considerable sway over governance. Adapting Poland’s lessons to Iran requires integrating religious stakeholders into the dialogue process while ensuring the separation of religious authority from state functions.

5.2 South Africa: The End of Apartheid

South Africa’s transition from apartheid to democracy offers critical lessons for nations like Iran that are navigating the complexities of democratization. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was central to South Africa’s approach, emphasizing reconciliation over retribution. This mechanism united a deeply divided society by addressing historical injustices and promoting collective healing (du Toit 2017). Visionary leadership also played a key role, with Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk demonstrating the importance of prioritizing peace and inclusivity over political gain (Kibble, Goodison, and Tsie 1995; van Wyk 2019). Furthermore, South Africa’s comprehensive legal reforms, including the abolition of apartheid laws and the drafting of a new constitution, underscore the necessity of robust institutional restructuring during democratic transitions (Saunders 2004).

5.2.1 Lessons for Iran:

Reconciliation Mechanisms: Establishing a structured reconciliation process, as exemplified by South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, can help address past injustices, foster healing, and unify fragmented societies.
Visionary Leadership: The role of leaders like Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk shows how leadership focused on peace and unity can guide a nation through complex transitions.
Legal and Institutional Reform: South Africa’s dismantling of apartheid laws and its new constitution underscore the importance of strong constitutional, legal and institutional foundations in democratic transitions.

5.2.2 Unique Challenges for Iran

While South Africa’s approach offers valuable lessons, Iran’s sociopolitical context introduces unique challenges:

Religious Dynamics: Unlike South Africa, Iran’s political system is deeply intertwined with religious authority. Integrating religious institutions into the reconciliation process will require balancing respect for religious traditions with the establishment of secular democratic principles.
Regional Influences: South Africa’s transition occurred in a relatively stable regional environment, whereas Iran operates within a geopolitically contentious region, potentially complicating international support and domestic stability.

5.3 Latin America: Chile’s Gradual Democratization

Chile’s transition from Augusto Pinochet’s dictatorship to democracy in the late 1980s highlights the importance of balancing justice with political stability. The pivotal moment in this transition was the 1988 plebiscite, a carefully negotiated event that allowed citizens to vote on whether Pinochet would continue in power. The “No” campaign won, paving the way for democratic elections and institutional reforms (Navia 2010). This transition demonstrates how gradual reforms, rather than abrupt overhauls, can dismantle an authoritarian legacy while preserving political and social stability.

Chile’s “protected democracy” model offers critical insights into managing the complexities of transition. The enduring influence of Pinochet-era policies, including the 1980 Constitution, required slow, incremental reforms to avoid destabilizing the state. The Concertación coalition—a political alliance that emphasized compromise and institutional adaptability—was instrumental in achieving a stable transition, showcasing the importance of political agreements in fostering long-term democratic consolidation (Lopes and Chehab 2015).

5.3.1 Lessons for Iran:

Incremental Legal Reforms: The dismantling of Pinochet-era policies illustrates how gradual legal and constitutional reforms can balance political stability with the introduction of democratic practices. For Iran, reforming entrenched theocratic structures will require a similar phased approach to avoid backlash from powerful elite factions, such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Justice and Reconciliation Mechanisms: Chile’s approach to addressing human rights abuses under Pinochet balanced accountability with reconciliation, avoiding overwhelming the state with retributive justice (Garretón 1999). Iran could adopt similar reconciliation mechanisms to address grievances from past political and religious oppression.
Political Pacts and Consensus-Building: The Concertación coalition demonstrated the importance of broad political pacts that include diverse stakeholders. For Iran, fostering consensus among reformists, moderate conservatives, and opposition groups can help stabilize the transition process and prevent factional infighting.
Balancing Stability with Democratization: Chile’s “protected democracy” model emphasized gradual reforms under stable conditions, helping to prevent backlash from entrenched elites and maintain order. Iran can replicate this approach by sequencing reforms strategically to build trust among citizens and elites.

5.3.2 Unique Challenges for Iran

While Chile’s transition provides valuable insights, Iran’s unique sociopolitical and religious context presents distinct challenges:

Elite Power Dynamics: Chile’s elites negotiated the transition through political agreements, while Iran’s powerful factions, such as the IRGC, require strategies that address their military and economic interests.
Religious Governance: Unlike Chile, Iran’s system integrates religious authority into the state, necessitating reforms that redefine the relationship between religion and governance without alienating conservative factions.

5.4 The Arab Spring: Divergent Outcomes

The Arab Spring of 2011 revealed critical insights about the challenges of democratization in the Middle East and North Africa. These movements underscored the importance of institutional resilience and the dangers of governance vacuums. While Tunisia succeeded in navigating a relatively stable democratic transition, countries like Egypt and Syria experienced divergent outcomes due to differences in institutional strength and governance strategies. In Tunisia, pre-existing civil institutions played a vital role in supporting a democratic framework. This institutional resilience enabled the country to manage social and political transitions effectively, emphasizing the necessity of robust institutions in sustaining democracy (Zgurić 2012). In contrast, Egypt faced weak institutional structures that created a governance vacuum post-transition, ultimately facilitating a return to military rule. This underscores the critical need for a clear and structured governance plan to avoid chaos and power struggles during transitions (Al-Jubori 2017). Furthermore, Syria’s descent into civil war further highlights the consequences of inadequate institutions and the absence of a comprehensive transition plan. The lack of adaptive and resilient governance structures in Syria fueled fragmentation and conflict, illustrating the importance of preparing inclusive frameworks that can address the diverse needs of a transitioning society (Chaney 2012).

5.4.1 Lessons for Iran:

Institutional Strength: Tunisia’s success demonstrates the critical role of strong, resilient institutions in sustaining democracy. Iran can draw from this lesson by focusing on strengthening its institutional framework during a transition, ensuring it can manage diverse political and social needs.
Avoiding Power Vacuums: Egypt’s experience highlights the dangers of a weak governance plan during transitions. For Iran, a structured and inclusive governance framework will be essential to prevent instability and power struggles among factions.
Balanced Governance Framework: Syria’s descent into civil war emphasizes the importance of building cohesive governance structures. Institutions must be adaptable and inclusive, addressing the needs of various societal groups to prevent fragmentation and violence.

5.4.2 Unique Challenges for Iran

While lessons from the Arab Spring are relevant, Iran’s unique sociopolitical context presents distinct challenges:

Religious Authority and Governance: Unlike Tunisia and Egypt, Iran’s political system is deeply intertwined with religious institutions. Transitioning to democracy will require balancing respect for religious authority with the establishment of a governance model that upholds democratic principles.
Ethnic and Sectarian Diversity: Iran’s significant ethnic and sectarian diversity—comprising Persians, Kurds, Baluchis, Arabs, and others—introduces additional complexity. Ensuring representation and addressing grievances among these groups will be crucial to maintaining national cohesion during the transition.
Regional Geopolitical Pressures: Iran’s strategic importance and contentious relationships with neighboring countries could invite external interference during a democratic transition, complicating internal governance efforts. Lessons from Syria’s experience with foreign involvement underscore the need for careful management of regional dynamics.
Military Influence: Unlike Tunisia’s relatively apolitical military, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) wields substantial political and economic power. Managing the IRGC’s role in a transition will require careful negotiation to prevent destabilization.

5.5 The Iraqi Experience

Although Iraq’s 2003 regime change resulted largely from external intervention rather than a purely domestic movement, its post-regime constitution (adopted in 2005) offers additional regional insight. Unlike transitions in Eastern Europe or South Africa, Iraq’s case was marked by the rapid toppling of state structures, a prolonged insurgency, and sectarian conflict (Dawisha 2013; Diamond 2015). Lesons for Iran:

Risk of Institutional Collapse: Rapid dismantling of state structures fueled chaos. A transition in Iran must avoid abrupt institutional disintegration and instead ensure continuity in governance to prevent chaos.
Importance of Elite Integration: Excluding former elites compounded instability. In Iran, the transition plan’s emphasis on amnesty and integration of security forces addresses this gap, but the Iraqi example underscores the fragility of such processes.
Sectarian Considerations: Power-sharing frameworks must accommodate diverse groups.
While the Iraqi experience differs from Poland-style negotiated transitions, it reinforces the importance of preserving institutional continuity, inclusive governance, and avoiding sudden purges that might generate long-term instability (Diamond 2015).

5.6 Implications for Iran’s Transition

To support Iran’s transition to a stable democracy, the following strategies leverage lessons from successful democratization efforts worldwide:

Engagement of Armed Forces: Integrating key security forces, such as the Iranian Army (Artesh) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), into the transition framework can help ensure stability and reduce the potential for violent resistance. Historical examples, such as South Africa’s engagement with its armed forces during the end of apartheid, show how including military factions in negotiations can prevent power struggles and facilitate a peaceful governance shift (Sparks 1994). Similarly, Chile’s negotiated transition under Pinochet highlights the importance of addressing the interests of entrenched security elites to secure their cooperation (Garretón 1999).
Inclusive Amnesty and Reconciliation: Offering amnesty to current regime members and establishing reconciliation mechanisms may encourage participation in the transition process without fear of retribution. South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission serves as a prominent example of how structured reconciliation can foster unity and allow former regime members to contribute positively to the new political order (du Toit 2017). In Iran, such frameworks could address past grievances and create an inclusive platform for reform.
Strengthening Civil Society and Inclusive Participation: Empowering non-governmental organizations, civil society groups, and grassroots movements is crucial for fostering democratic values and public engagement. Poland’s Solidarity movement demonstrated the power of civil society in mobilizing citizens and challenging entrenched power structures (Bielasiak 2010). Similarly, Tunisia’s democratic transition emphasized the role of civil society in building a foundation of trust and stability (Zgurić 2012). For Iran, fostering inclusive participation across societal groups can stabilize the transition and build public confidence in democratic governance.
Legal and Constitutional Transition Framework: A clear constitutional roadmap is vital for legitimizing the transition and ensuring continuity. South Africa’s adoption of a new constitution underscored the importance of strong legal foundations in anchoring democratic practices (Saunders 2004). Iran’s reforms must prioritize human rights protections and institutional accountability to reduce the risk of authoritarian backslide. Establishing institutions capable of upholding these laws is critical for ensuring the rule of law and sustaining democratic governance.
Engagement of Iranian Diaspora: The Iranian diaspora, comprising millions of individuals living in North America, Europe, and the Middle East, plays a significant role in shaping Iran’s transition to democracy. Historically, exiled communities have contributed to democratization efforts by fostering dialogue, advocating for human rights, and providing financial and intellectual resources. The Iranian diaspora’s involvement can be instrumental in the following ways:
1. Political Advocacy and International Pressure: Iranian expatriates have historically been vocal in lobbying foreign governments and international organizations to promote democratic reforms and human rights in Iran. For instance, the role of Chilean exiles in mobilizing global opposition to Pinochet’s dictatorship (Wright 2007) serves as a model for how the Iranian diaspora can influence international policy and generate external pressure on the Iranian government.
2. Economic Investment and Reconstruction: A democratic transition in Iran would require substantial economic support, and the Iranian diaspora could be a key source of investment, particularly in rebuilding civil institutions, supporting independent media, and fostering entrepreneurship. The case of post-Soviet Eastern Europe illustrates how expatriate communities played a crucial role in economic stabilization and institutional reform (Åslund 2002).
3. Knowledge Transfer and Capacity Building: Many highly educated Iranians residing abroad could contribute expertise in law, governance, technology, and business, helping to strengthen Iran’s transition. The role of South African expatriates in transferring governance knowledge during the post-apartheid transition highlights how diaspora engagement can provide essential technical support for emerging democratic institutions (Adler and Webster 1995).
4. Media and Communication Networks: Exiled Iranian journalists and media outlets, such as BBC Persian and Iran International, have played a key role in providing uncensored news and countering state propaganda. The impact of independent media in transitions, as seen in Poland and the Czech Republic, underscores the importance of the diaspora in fostering an informed public capable of holding leaders accountable (IRBC 2015).
5. Facilitating Dialogue Between Reformists and Opposition Groups: The Iranian diaspora can serve as a bridge between domestic opposition groups, reformists within the country, and international actors. The experience of Argentine exiles during the transition from military rule demonstrates how diaspora-led discussions can shape reconciliation efforts and institutional reform (S Levitsky and Murillo 2005).
International Support and Diplomacy: Constructive international engagement can provide essential resources, technical support, and diplomatic backing for Iran’s democratization. For example, international support for Tunisia during the Arab Spring demonstrated how partnerships with democratic institutions could bolster credibility and create accountability for democratic commitments (Chaney 2012). Similarly, diplomatic efforts in Eastern Europe after the Cold War highlighted the value of external actors in facilitating peaceful transitions (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).

Chapter 6: Advantages of Supporting the Transition

Supporting democratic transition in Iran offers extensive benefits for global and regional powers. The stability, energy security, and reduced proliferation risks associated with democratic governance align with the strategic interests of both regional and global stakeholders across the Western and Eastern blocs, fostering a secure and cooperative global environment.

6.1 Advantages of Engagement

6.1.1 Enhanced Regional Stability and Security

Reduced Proxy Conflicts: Stable, democratically governed Middle Eastern nations are less likely to support destabilizing proxy groups, reducing tensions across borders and easing the burden of defense expenditures on neighboring countries and global powers (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).
Diplomatic Pathways: Democratic governance encourages diplomatic normalization, facilitating de-escalation of regional conflicts and opening avenues for constructive dialogue, reducing the reliance on costly military solutions (Diamond and Plattner 2014).
Counter-Terrorism Coordination: With democratic allies, global powers can consolidate counter-terrorism strategies, jointly diminishing the influence of extremist groups that pose security threats on regional and global levels (Horowits 1985).

6.1.2 Assured Nuclear Non-Proliferation

Non-Proliferation Treaty Compliance: Democratically governed Iran is more likely to uphold nuclear agreements, fostering transparency and reinforcing trust, in line with international non-proliferation efforts (Sagan 2011).
Stronger Oversight: Collaborative relationships with democratic Iran allow for robust nuclear inspections and monitoring, ensuring peaceful nuclear developments (Norris 2011).

6.1.3 Economic Growth and Energy Security

Stable Energy Supplies: A democtaric Iran is more likely to promote stable oil and gas markets, reducing volatility and ensuring dependable energy supplies for importing nations, which enhances global energy security (Rodrik 2000).
Increased Trade & Investment: Economic stability in democratic states provides reliable markets for investment, particularly in infrastructure and technology sectors, spurring regional growth and benefiting global markets (Acemoglu and Robinson 2013).
Mutual Prosperity: Open trade with other stable economies fosters mutual growth, supporting a more integrated global market system (R. D. Putnam 2000).

6.1.4 Diplomatic Leverage and Strategic Alliances

Improved Multilateral Relations: Stable democracies are well-positioned to align with NATO and EU interests, enhancing cooperative diplomatic relations and contributing to reduced regional tensions (Krasner 1999).
Stronger Alliances: Democratically aligned Iran offers strategic advantages for both NATO-aligned and Eastern bloc countries by fostering secure trade routes and reducing defense-related expenditures (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010).

6.1.5 Advancement of Human Rights and Democratic Values

Governance Standards: Promoting democratic values in Iran underscores a commitment to human rights, aligning with global principles of individual freedoms and signaling a broader adherence to governance standards (Huntington 1991).
Soft Power Gains: A successful democratic transition in the Middle East bolsters the soft power of supporting nations, setting a model for governance that enhances global influence (Diamond and Plattner 2014).

6.1.6 Divergent Global Interests and Domestic Receptivity

China and Russia prioritize energy security and strategic influence over democracy (Hussain 2021), while Western nations condition engagement on political reforms. Domestically, Iran’s historical grievances (e.g., 1953 coup) fuel skepticism. Reformists may welcome selective aid, while conservatives see external support as a sovereignty threat. Effective support must emphasize Iran-led, transparent initiatives.

6.1.7 Alleviating Migration Pressures

Reduced Refugee Outflows: Stable, democratic governance decreases migration pressures by addressing economic and political grievances domestically, reducing refugee flows to Europe and other regions (R. D. Putnam 2000).

6.1.8 Strategic Containment of Adversarial Influence

Limiting Expansion of Rival Powers: A democratic Iran aligns with Western and Eastern bloc goals of limiting adversarial influence in the region, ensuring balanced alliances, secure trade routes, and energy resource protection (Acemoglu and Robinson 2013).

6.1.9 Collaboration on Global Challenges

Health Security: Stable democracies are more reliable partners in addressing global health crises, contributing to robust pandemic preparedness and health security measures (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010).
Climate & Environmental Collaboration: Democratic governance enhances regional participation in climate agreements, contributing meaningfully to global sustainability efforts, which are critical in the ecologically sensitive Middle East (Rodrik 2000).

These advantages highlight the substantial benefits of supporting democratic governance in Iran for regional stability, economic growth, and strengthened global alliances. Supporting this transition aligns with the security, economic, and diplomatic interests of both Western and Eastern blocs, fostering a more secure and prosperous global environment.

6.2 Risks of Non-engagement

While engagement with democratic transitions in Iran promises extensive benefits, non-engagement or passive support carries significant risks. Without active involvement, global and regional powers face the following challenges:

Escalation of Proxy Conflicts: In the absence of democratic reforms, authoritarian regimes may continue or even increase support for proxy groups, intensifying regional instability and security threats to neighboring countries. This escalation risks further strain on international relations and increased defense spending to contain these conflicts (Levitsky and Way 2010). Iran’s support for Hezbollah and Hamas exemplifies this, similar to post-2003 Iraq’s militia conflicts (Dawisha 2013). Recent setbacks for Tehran’s proxies (e.g., Hamas and Hezbollah) (Mahmood 2024; Saraswat 2024) suggest continued authoritarianism could drive Iran toward irregular tactics, if not engaged with constructively.
Increased Nuclear Proliferation Risks: Non-engagement leaves nuclear compliance unchecked, as authoritarian Iran may avoid or circumvent international oversight. This could lead to nuclear escalation and heightened global security concerns, particularly for regions already vulnerable to conflict (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986). Extended authoritarian rule can exacerbate secrecy and reduce transparency, raising the potential for clandestine nuclear activities. Like North Korea, an isolated Iran could evade oversight, undermining global non-proliferation efforts (Sagan 2011). A similar dynamic in Iran, absent engagement or monitoring, could undermine global non-proliferation efforts.
Economic Instability and Energy Market Volatility: Authoritarian governance often lacks the stability needed for long-term economic growth. The continuation of repressive systems may lead to market unpredictability, limiting secure access to energy resources for global powers and disrupting supply chains (Rodrik 2000). Authoritarian regimes foster corruption and erratic policies, deterring investors. Venezuela’s collapse illustrates these dangers (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010). Given Iran’s role in global energy (e.g. Hormuz Straint oversight, vast natural resources, etc.) instability could trigger price shocks (Rodrik 2000).
Weakening of Diplomatic Influence: Non-engagement weakens diplomatic leverage, as undemocratic regimes may seek alignment with rival powers, eroding alliances. This shift risks fragmenting global cooperation and destabilizing strategic alliances that underpin international peace efforts (Krasner 1999). They risk alienating potential allies and diplomatic partners, limiting their capacity to negotiate favorable trade or security agreements. Myanmar’s isolation after human rights abuses (Norris 2011) reflects how Iran’s continued repression could deepen its global marginalization.
Human Rights and Migration Pressures: Lack of support for democratic governance correlates with continued human rights abuses and an increase in refugee outflows. This strains migration systems in Europe and beyond, creating complex social and economic challenges that hinder domestic stability in receiving nations (R. D. Putnam 2000). Syria’s crisis showed how authoritarian rule can create mass displacement(Chaney 2012), a risk Iran faces if internal grievances escalate.
Enhanced Rival Influence: : Authoritarian regimes often turn to rival powers for support, giving these adversarial states greater regional influence. This undermines the strategic balance and threatens energy security, trade routes, and military positioning, impacting both Western and Eastern blocs (Diamond and Plattner 2014). Recent setbacks to Iranian proxies (Hamas, Hezbollah, and a weakened Houthi force) indicate that Tehran’s regional strategy may be in flux (Mahmood 2024; Saraswat 2024). For Iran, non-engagement could deepen reliance on Russia or China for political cover and economic support, reshaping regional alliances in ways that challenge Western and regional interests (Krasner 1999). In addition, if Iran remains authoritarian yet loses proxy capabilities, it may seek alternative forms of external support—from Russia or China, for instance—potentially shifting the regional balance of power in unpredictable ways.

By not actively supporting democratic transition in Iran, global powers risk exacerbating instability and forfeiting diplomatic influence, strategic security, and economic stability in the Middle East. These outcomes emphasize the strategic necessity of engagement to ensure a balanced, prosperous, and secure global environment.

Chapter 7: The Democratic Constitution for Iran

The proposed new constitution for Iran serves as the cornerstone for a peaceful and sustainable democratic transition. This constitution is crafted to be used as a draft for replacing the existing constitutional structure with a governance model that prioritizes human rights, inclusivity, and the rule of law. It tries to reflect the aspirations of the Iranian people for a system that respects individual freedoms, promotes diversity and social equity, and ensures accountability within the government. The full text of the constitution, including 13 chapters, is available in Appendix A.

7.1 Key Principles of the New Constitution

Human Rights Protections: Central to the new constitution is an unwavering commitment to protecting human rights, including freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, gender equality, and protection against discrimination. These protections align Iran’s governance model with international human rights standards and set a foundation for individual freedoms and dignity.
Separation of Powers: to prevent the consolidation of authority, the new constitution enshrines a clear separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Each branch is given independent oversight responsibilities, and checks and balances are implemented to foster accountability, transparency, and impartiality in governance.
Inclusivity and Diversity: Recognizing Iran’s diverse society, the constitution ensures proportional representation of all communities, including minorities. This provision aims to create a government that mirrors Iran’s social makeup and addresses the needs of all its citizens.
Rule of Law and Judicial Independence: The constitution establishes a robust legal framework to guarantee the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. It emphasizes impartial legal processes, fair trials, and protections against political interference in judicial matters, ensuring equal treatment and justice for all citizens.
Civilian Oversight of the Armed Forces: The constitution limits the military’s role in governance by mandating civilian oversight of the armed forces. This clause is essential for transitioning to a democratic state and ensures that the military remains focused on national defense rather than political influence.
Integration of Military Forces: The constitution mandates a single military force for Iran—the Iranian Army (Artesh)—requiring the merger of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC or Sepah) into the Army. This unification will occur after the first official election and will be implemented by the newly elected officials. All existing ranks and salaries of IRGC members will be retained within the new organization. This integration aims to streamline the military structure while preserving the careers and statuses of military personnel.
Protection of Businesses and Economic Interests: The constitution guarantees the protection of life, property, and economic interests of all Iranians. During and after the transition, the government must abide by the constitution and protect the lives, properties, and economic interests of all Iranian businessmen and entrepreneurs. By ensuring legal safeguards and stability for existing businesses, the transition aims to foster economic confidence and prevent opposition to the democratic process from the business community.
Economic Rights and Anti-Corruption Measures: Economic rights are reinforced in the constitution, which includes protections for property rights, encouragement of market reforms, and anti-corruption measures. By establishing transparency requirements and accountability mechanisms, the constitution seeks to prevent cronyism and encourage economic stability and growth.
Prohibition of Personal or Group Vengeance: The constitution explicitly prohibits any form of personal or group vengeance. All grievances must be addressed through lawful and impartial judicial processes, ensuring that justice is administered fairly and without retaliation. This principle promotes social harmony, upholds the rule of law, and facilitates a peaceful transition to democracy.
Amnesty for Facilitators of Peaceful Transition: The constitution provides an amnesty to individuals who actively assist in the peaceful transition from the current authoritarian regime to a secular democracy. This amnesty applies to political offenses related to their participation in the transition process, excluding serious crimes such as human rights violations or acts against humanity. By offering legal protection to those who support the democratic movement, the constitution encourages cooperation and reduces potential resistance, aiding in a smoother transition.
Legal and Service Continuity: The constitution guarantees the continuity of legal systems and public services during and after the transition to democracy. Existing laws and institutions remain operational unless amended in accordance with the new constitutional procedures. State employees, civil servants, security forces, police, and judiciary personnel retain their positions and duties, ensuring stability and preventing disruptions in governance and public services.
Role of Religion and Religious Freedom: The constitution separates political authority from religious institutions, ensuring pluralism and equal treatment.
Role of Religion and Religious Freedom: The proposed constitution does not exclude Islam or religious expressions from the public sphere; rather, it separates ultimate political authority from religious institutions. This distinction is intended to safeguard pluralism and equal treatment of all religious and ethnic communities. While some stakeholders may advocate a larger role for Islamic values in governance, the principle here is to ensure that no single religious interpretation monopolizes state power. This approach aligns with scholarship arguing that Islam and democracy can be compatible when institutional frameworks allow free religious practice but prevent any religious entity from overriding constitutional provisions.
Implications of These Principles: Each principle carries significant structural implications. For instance, guaranteeing human rights may require aligning domestic laws with international conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to provide legal remedies for citizens. Similarly, military unification under civilian control demands robust oversight institutions—parliamentary committees, independent watchdogs—to ensure compliance and accountability. Without such mechanisms, the mere constitutional endorsement of rights and civilian oversight may remain symbolic rather than transformative.

7.2 Explanation of the New Constitution’s Role in Transition

The new constitution is primarily a legal document composed of detailed Articles that establish the framework for Iran’s future governance. It serves as a foundational guideline for the country’s democratic transition. By addressing the grievances and aspirations of the Iranian people, it offers the structural and ethical basis necessary for a stable and prosperous future. Through inclusive representation and robust legal protections, the constitution fosters unity and trust among diverse communities.

The separation of powers and the integration of military forces under civilian oversight are critical components for dismantling authoritarian structures. By mandating a single military force—the Iranian Army (Artesh)—and merging the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC or Sepah) into it, the constitution ensures that the armed forces are unified and focused solely on national defense. Economic protections and anti-corruption measures lay the groundwork for long-term stability and growth, promoting transparency and accountability in governance. While the constitution provides the guiding principles, this paper offers a detailed roadmap based on those principles to navigate each phase of the transition plan. Through education campaigns and referendums, the public will have direct input, ensuring that both the constitution and the transition process reflect a shared commitment to democratic principles and the rule of law.

7.3 Transition Financial Support Mechanism

A noteworthy innovation of the new constitutional draft is found in Section 2 of Chapter 12, which establishes a comprehensive Transition Financial Support System (TFSS). This mechanism is designed to stabilize the economy during the democratic transition by channeling voluntary contributions from Iranian citizens and the Iranian diaspora into a dedicated fund. Under the TFSS, eligible individuals may provide financial support in the form of loans that the new government repays the debt—backed by government-issued securities tied to future revenues. Transparency is ensured through strict oversight by an independent Oversight Committee, with quarterly public reports, and robust anti-corruption measures to prevent illicit influence or misuse of funds. By linking economic stabilization directly to the transition process, the TFSS not only mitigates short-term financial volatility but also reinforces domestic confidence in the reform agenda without conferring undue political leverage to any donor.

Key elements of TFSS include:

Voluntary Contributions: Only individuals of Iranian origin may contribute, with funds vetted for legitimacy.
Repayment Structure: The government commits to repaying contributions within a defined period using transparent, government-backed instruments.
Oversight and Transparency: Regular audits and public reporting ensure accountability, while stringent measures guard against foreign influence.
Economic Stability: Funds are earmarked for critical areas such as democratic transition administration, infrastructure, public services, and legal reform, thereby supporting both immediate and long-term economic stability.

Chapter 8: Methodology of Transition and the Plan

The proposed transition plan for Iran is structured into five key phases, each incorporating strategic actions to ensure a peaceful, inclusive, and sustainable shift toward democratic governance. This approach addresses Iran’s unique socio-political landscape by prioritizing stakeholder engagement, legal reform, and accountability.

Inclusive Dialogue: The plan emphasizes broad-based engagement through national conferences and public forums that invite political factions, civil society, and minority groups to participate. These dialogues aim to build consensus, promote reconciliation, and foster trust among diverse stakeholders, creating a foundation for collaborative transition efforts (Ghobadzadeh 2014).
Legal Reforms: Establishing a democratic legal foundation is essential. The plan involves revising or repealing restrictive laws, reforming the judiciary for impartiality, and restructuring governance to embed human rights and the separation of powers within the constitutional framework (Gheissari and Nasr 2009). This alignment with democratic principles aims to create a legal system that upholds equality and accountability.
Public Participation To ensure citizen involvement, the plan incorporates public education campaigns and referendums that empower Iranians to participate actively in shaping the new political order. Civic education initiatives inform citizens about democratic principles, while referendums allow them to approve or reject constitutional changes, thus enhancing the transition’s legitimacy and ensuring public ownership of the process (Levitsky and Way 2010).
Engagement with Business Elites and Armed Forces: Recognizing the significant influence of Iran’s business elites and the IRGC, the plan seeks constructive engagement with these groups. By addressing their economic interests and security concerns, the transition aims to reduce potential resistance and secure cooperation or neutrality, mitigating risks to the process (Keshavarzian 2007; Alamdari 2005).
International Engagement: : Strategic international engagement is integral to the transition plan, seeking diplomatic recognition, economic support, and technical assistance to align with international norms. Such backing can enhance stability, reduce external pressures, and help establish the new democratic government on secure footing (Huntington 1991).
Monitoring and Evaluation: Transparency and accountability are ensured through oversight bodies (e.g. committees) that monitor progress and evaluate each phase’s implementation, providing regular reports to the public. This process fosters public trust and maintains adherence to democratic principles throughout the transition (Ghobadzadeh 2014; O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).

8.1 Phase 1: Establishing the NTC and the TFSS

Objective: To lay the foundation for a peaceful and economically stable transition to democracy,

Steps:

1) Establish the NTC

Stakeholder Inclusion: Assemble a National Transition Council (NTC) comprising 25–75 members to ensure representation across critical groups, including political factions, civil society organizations, business elites, minority groups, religious leaders, the Iranian armed forces, and expatriate communities. This board size strikes a balance between diversity and decision-making efficiency, allowing essential interests to participate meaningfully in the transition. The board may initiate its work once it reaches a quorum of 11 members, with a mandate to expand to a minimum of 25 members to fully reflect Iran’s diverse socio-political landscape (Higley and Burton 1989).
Define Roles and Responsibilities: Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder within the NTC to ensure fair representation and transparency in decision-making. This structure promotes accountability and a collaborative approach to the transition (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).
Integrate Independent Oversight Mechanisms: Establish an advisory panel of legal scholars, political analysts, and former officials to guide decision-making and monitor democratic alignment (Diamond 1999).
Commit to Democratic Principles: Require all board members to formally endorse the new Constitution and its core values, including human rights, inclusivity, and democratic governance, fostering a unified commitment to peaceful reform. Each member must swear allegiance solely to the democratic objectives of the transition, pledging not to pursue any alternative political agendas that could disrupt the process. This oath ensures that the coalition remains focused, cohesive, and resistant to factional influence, thus safeguarding the integrity of the transition plan (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).

2) Establish the TFSS

Purpose & Design: Create a structured, transparent mechanism to secure voluntary financial contributions from eligible Iranian citizens and expatriates. These funds will support critical areas such as infrastructure rebuilding, transitional governance, election organization, and economic stabilization.
Contribution Framework: Only individuals of Iranian origin, or organizations with at least 51% Iranian ownership are eligible to contribute, and all funds must undergo rigorous due diligence to ensure their legitimacy. Contributions will be treated as loans, to be repaid by the new government through government-backed securities tied to future revenues.
Oversight & Transparency: Set up an independent Financial Transparency and Ethics Committee (FTEC) to monitor fund usage. This committee will publish quarterly financial reports and conduct regular audits to prevent any misuse or undue foreign influence.
Economic Impact: By linking the financial support directly to the transition, the TFSS aims to mitigate short-term economic volatility and bolster confidence among both domestic stakeholders and the international community.

3) Develop a Unified Platform

Draft a Shared Vision Charter: Working groups draft objectives, timelines, and a conflict-resolution framework (Boyte 2004). This charter would then be deliberated in open forums, allowing broader citizen feedback and refinement. The final version undergoes public consultation before formal adoption.
Outline Key Objectives: Set immediate goals for the board, such as initiating dialogue with the government, building international support, and raising public awareness of the transition plan, etc.
Form Specialized Committees: Establish dedicated committees within the NTC, each with specific and clearly defined responsibilities. These committees (e.g. legal reform, public outreach, etc.) will ensure focused action on critical areas, streamline decision-making, and enhance accountability in executing the transition plan. Each committee must be headed and led by a board member to maintain alignment with the board’s objectives. However, non-board members with relevant expertise and skills can be appointed to support committee work, bringing in specialized knowledge and assisting with on-the-ground tasks as needed. This structure enables the coalition to leverage broader expertise while maintaining central oversight and coherence in the transition efforts (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010).
Secure Financial Resources: Develop a transparent funding strategy, including international grants and domestic contributions, with full public disclosure (Ghobadzadeh 2014).
Leverage Iranian Diaspora Expertise and Networks: Establish a Diaspora Advisory Board (DAB) within the NTC to engage Iranian expatriates in policy development, economic strategy, and diplomatic outreach. This board will include professionals in law, governance, business, technology, finance, and media to provide technical assistance, funding strategies, and international advocacy (Hakimzadeh 2006; Ghorashi 2003).

4) Coordinate Public Engagement and Communication

Launch Public Information Campaigns: Educate citizens about the new constitution and the coalition’s objectives through public forums, media, and secure online platforms.
Establish Transparency: Maintain open channels between the coalition and the public, providing regular updates on progress, challenges, and upcoming steps in the transition.
Early Warning & Crisis Response Team: Establish a rapid-response unit within the NTC to address emerging threats, propaganda, or internal factional disputes before they escalate (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010).

8.2 Phase 2: Negotiations and Securing Trust

Objective: Conduct structured negotiations with the government and global stakeholders for peaceful transition acceptance.

Steps:

1) Internal Dialog

Initiate Dialogue: Use secure, confidential channels to communicate with high-level government officials, military leaders, and the Supreme Leader’s office (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).
Propose Terms of Transition: Present a negotiation agenda aligned with the new constitution, emphasizing security assurances, gradual power transfer, and provisions for amnesty for non-violent officials (Higley and Burton 1989).
Engage with Security Forces: Secure the cooperation or neutrality of the IRGC, Artesh, and other armed forces by providing stability incentives and assurances of non-intervention in civilian governance. Assure these security forces that their personal safety, as well as the safety of their families and financial assets, will be protected throughout and beyond the transition. This guarantee aims to reduce resistance from influential military groups, facilitating a smoother and more stable shift to democratic governance. To reinforce trust, these protections could later be enshrined in law, extending safeguards to all stakeholders involved in the transition process. (H. Chehabi and Linz 1998).
Truth and Reconciliation Framework: Create a transitional justice mechanism to address past abuses and prevent cycles of retribution (Skaar, García-Godos, and Collins 2016).
Social and Psychological Rehabilitation Programs: Provide mental health support for political prisoners, victims, and their families (Hamber 2009).

2) External Negotiations for International Support

Seek Diplomatic Endorsement: Approach international allies, UN representatives, and other global powers to support the transition publicly, framing it as a path to regional stability (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010).
Mobilize Iranian Diaspora for Diplomatic Advocacy and Investment: Encourage Iranian expatriates to lobby for support, reduce sanctions, and invest in Iran through transparent legal protections (Naficy 1993; Shahin 1999).
Leverage Economic Incentives: Request targeted economic assistance, reduced sanctions, and technical support to help stabilize Iran during the transition period (Rodrik 2000; Diamond 1999).
Ensure Stability: Emphasize the NTC’s commitment to maintaining order and continuity throughout the transition, addressing concerns over potential instability. All commitments to foreign powers must be completely transparent and publicly accessible, ensuring that foreign engagement aligns with national interests and builds trust among Iranian citizens (Andreas 2002; Tufekci 2017).

3) Publicize Key Agreements

Promote Transparency: Regularly update the public on negotiation outcomes, fostering trust and maintaining momentum (Andreas 2002; Diamond 1999).
Highlight Constitutional Alignment: Reassure citizens that all negotiation terms adhere strictly to the new constitution’s values, reinforcing legitimacy and public support (Ginsburg, Elkins, and Blount 2009; O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).

8.3 Phase 3: Assuming Power and Filling the Power Vacuum

Objective: Form an interim government under NTC oversight to prevent a power vacuum.

Steps:

1) Form an Interim Government

Appoint Leadership: Appoint an interim President, Vice President, and ministers, ensuring proportional representation, merit, and transparency (Higley and Burton 1989; Diamond 1999).
Define Governance Protocols: Implement a governance structure that adheres to this constitutional framework, guided by democratic principles, checks, and balances to ensure accountability (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).
Provisional Judiciary Reform Committee: Establish a legal review body to repeal repressive laws and initiate judicial reforms to uphold the rule of law (H. Chehabi and Linz 1998).

2) Public Campaign to Assume Power

Engage Citizens: Conduct a national campaign to inform citizens about the transition’s goals, emphasizing stability, democratic values, and commitment to the new constitution. This campaign seeks to build public support, positioning the interim government as the legitimate governing authority (Tufekci 2017).
Secure Local & Regional Authorities: Engage local and regional authorities to support the transition, ensuring continuity of essential services and maintaining order across the country. Finalize agreements with the IRGC, Artesh, Police, and other security forces, securing their commitment to maintain public safety without political interference. Clear communication ensures alignment with the new government’s objectives (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010; H. Chehabi and Linz 1998).
Anti-Corruption Task Force Establish an anti-corruption task force to monitor financial misconduct and prevent asset misappropriation (Rose-Ackerman 2007).
Emergency Economic Stabilization Plan: Implement immediate relief measures (wage protections, subsidies, economic stimulus) to prevent financial collapse (Rodrik 2000).

3) Assuming Full Power

Secure Key Government Institutions: Once support and cooperation are solidified, the interim government formally assumes control over Iran’s central government institutions, ministries, and administrative structures, effectively filling the power vacuum and establishing recognized governance (Saeidi 2004; O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).
Public Declaration of Authority: Announce the formal assumption of governing authority, detailing the roles and responsibilities of the interim government and reiterating its dedication to democratic principles and constitutional values (Diamond 1999).

4) Maintain Stability

Coordinate with Armed Forces: Collaborate with IRGC, Artesh, and other security forces to maintain order during the transition (Saeidi 2004).
Empower Local Authorities: Engage regional and local leaders to sustain public services and foster community trust (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010).
Support Private Businesses: Ensure regulatory stability and protect property rights to sustain economic activity and prevent capital flight (Acemoglu and Robinson 2013).

5) Establishing International Liaison Office

Diplomatic Channels: Set up a dedicated office to engage with foreign governments, secure financial aid, and coordinate technical support in alignment with Iran’s national interests (Steven Levitsky and Way 2010; Diamond 1999).
Monitor International Agreements: Ensure that all international engagements adhere to constitutional principles, with an emphasis on respecting human rights and national sovereignty (Andreas 2002).
Public Disclosure of Aid: All financial or other types of aid received from any foreign government must be fully disclosed to the public, ensuring transparency and accountability (Acemoglu and Robinson 2013).
Engage the Iranian Diaspora: Establish programs to leverage Iranian expatriates’ expertise, network, and resources, encouraging investment and building international trust (Hakimzadeh 2006; Naficy 1993; Ghorashi 2003).

This structured approach, with a focused campaign to assume control, defined executive roles, and an inclusive plan for military integration, ensures that the NTC and interim government can effectively manage the transition, uphold stability, and maintain accountability as Iran progresses toward a permanent democratic framework.

8.4 Phase 4: Referendum and Elections

Objective: Organize a constitutional referendum followed by the first democratic election.

Steps:

1) Conduct the Constitutional Referendum

Public Education Campaigns: Launch nationwide initiatives to educate citizens about the new constitution, its core values, and the implications for democratic governance. Utilize various media platforms to reach a broad audience and ensure comprehensive understanding (Silver et al. 2024).
Parallel Constitution Accessibility Initiative Organize forums, town hall meetings, and interactive sessions to hear public concerns, answer questions, and gather feedback. This engagement ensures that citizens’ voices are heard, and their concerns are addressed (NCSL 2024).
Engage with the Public: Organize forums, town hall meetings, and interactive sessions to hear public concerns, answer questions, and gather feedback. This engagement ensures that citizens’ voices are heard, and their concerns are addressed (NCSL 2024).
Minor Revisions by the Board: Based on public feedback, a designated board of constitutional lawyers will make minor revisions to the constitution to enhance clarity and ensure consistency with constitutional language. These revisions are limited to refining terminology and improving clarity; they must not introduce significant changes, omit key provisions, or alter the spirit of any articles. The board’s role is to uphold the constitution’s original intent while making its language more accessible and precise (Qvortrup and Trueblood 2023).
Secure & Transparent Voting: Implement secure, transparent voting systems overseen by independent bodies and international observers to ensure the integrity and credibility of the referendum process (Saltzer, Reed, and Clark 1984).
Broad Public Participation Promote widespread public participation to maximize legitimacy and demonstrate popular support for the new constitution. This includes outreach programs, voter registration drives, and making voting accessible to all citizens (Silver et al. 2024).
Referendum & Outcome: If an absolute majority accepts the constitution, proceed to elections; if not, establish a Constitutional High Council (300+ elected members) to revise and resubmit it (Qvortrup and Trueblood 2023).

2) Prepare for Elections

Electoral Oversight: Create a commission to oversee election integrity, prevent fraud, and ensure equal access for all candidates, according to the new constitution principles (UK Electoral Commission 2024).
International Observers: Collaborate with international observers to increase transparency and public confidence in the election process(UK Electoral Commission 2024).
Inclusivity: Make provisions for broad representation, including minority groups and women, in the election process according to the principles set out in the new constitution (UK Electoral Commission 2024).
Ethics Pledge: Require candidates to sign an ethics code against corruption, vote-buying, and undemocratic behavior.

3) Hold the First Election

Publicize the Election Process: Provide clear and comprehensive information to the public about the electoral process. This includes announcing electoral timelines, detailing candidate qualifications, explaining how to register to vote, and specifying voting locations. Utilize various communication channels—such as television, radio, newspapers, social media, and community meetings—to ensure widespread awareness and understanding (UK Electoral Commission 2024).
Engage Voters: Organize forums, debates, and town hall meetings where citizens can meet candidates and discuss key issues. This engagement promotes transparency and allows voters to make informed decisions.
Encourage Civic Participation: Emphasize the importance of voting in this historic transition through civic education programs. Offer resources and workshops to educate citizens about their voting rights, the significance of their participation, and the impact of their vote on the nation’s future. Special efforts should be made to reach marginalized communities to ensure inclusive participation (UK Electoral Commission 2024).
Conduct & Announce: Hold the election as scheduled and announce results transparently with detailed breakdowns (UK Electoral Commission 2024).

4) Transition Planning for Inauguration

Handover Coordination: Work with newly elected officials to ensure a smooth transfer of power.
Finalize Protocols: Develop clear protocols for transferring responsibilities, assets, and records.

8.5 Phase 5: Government Hand-off and Resignation

Objective: Complete the peaceful transition by formally resigning the interim government immediately after the inauguration of elected officials.

Steps:

1) Formal Handover Ceremony

Organize a National Event: Host a public inauguration ceremony to mark the peaceful transition of power, reinforcing the legitimacy of the new democratic government.
Symbolize the End of Interim Governance: Announce the formal resignation of all interim officials, transferring full authority to the newly elected leaders.

2) Transfer of Government Assets and Records

Transparent Handover: Handover all government assets, records, and documentation to the new administration, ensuring a complete and transparent transition.
Public Announcement: Publicly communicate the conclusion of the interim government’s role, reinforcing the establishment of a permanent democratic government under the new constitution.

3) Dissolve Interim Structures

Structure Desolution: Formally dissolve all interim power structures, including the board, its committees and subcommittees, and the interim government, transferring their responsibilities to permanent government structures.
Final Review: Ensure that all interim actions are subject to final review by independent oversight bodies to verify compliance with the constitution and transition plan.

Chapter 9: Key Challenges in Transition

9.1 Resistance from Government and Security Forces

High-ranking officials and security leaders may resist to protect power and resources.

Mitigations:

Incentivize Cooperation: Offer amnesty and economic security for non-violent actors to reduce opposition (O’Donnell et al., 1986).
Phased Transition: Gradual reforms allow time to adjust, lowering perceived threats to entrenched interests (Levitsky & Way, 2010).

9.2 Risk of Factionalism and Internal Division

Ideological differences may fragment coalition efforts.

Mitigations:

Inclusive Coalition: Ensure diverse representation on the NTC to unify support (Horowitz, 1985; Sisk, 1996).
Conflict Resolution Mechanisms: Regular, structured dialogues to address disputes and reinforce shared values of stability and prosperity (Putnam, 2000).

9.3 Public Distrust and Limited Civic Engagement

Distrust from years of repression could reduce support.

Mitigations:

Transparent Public Communication: Regular updates on decisions to build public trust (Norris, 2011).
Civic Education Campaigns: Inform citizens about democratic principles and civic rights to increase buy-in (Putnam, 2000).

9.4 Economic Instability During Transition

Economic volatility may destabilize public support.

Mitigations:

International Economic Support: Negotiate for financial aid and targeted investment from allies to stabilize the economy (Rodrik, 2000).
Controlled Economic Reforms: Phased reforms to prevent market shocks and instill confidence among stakeholders (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012).

9.5 Potential for External Interference

Competing foreign interests may seek to influence the transition.

Mitigations:

Non-Interference Agreements: Diplomatic engagement to secure international support for non-intervention policies (Krasner, 1999).
Transparency in Foreign Relations: Openly communicate foreign support to ensure public trust and maintain independence (Levitsky & Way, 2010).
Establishment of TFSS

9.6 Risk of Power Vacuum and Governance Gaps

Interim governance may lead to lapses in service continuity.

Mitigations:

Defined Interim Structure: Clearly delineate interim government roles to avoid ambiguity and ensure continuity (Diamond & Plattner, 2010).
Empower Local Governance: Engage local leaders to maintain civil order and support daily functions (Putnam, 2000).

9.7 Managing Expectations for Immediate Reform

Public impatience could weaken support.

Mitigations:

Set Realistic Goals: Communicate timelines for gradual reform to manage expectations (Hirschman, 1973).
Highlight Early Wins: Demonstrate quick, visible improvements to sustain momentum (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012).

9.8 Risk of Sabotage by Extremist Factions

Hardline factions may attempt to undermine the transition.

Mitigations:

Secure Key Leaders: Protect leaders and transition officials with security protocols (Levitsky & Way, 2010).
Moderation Advocacy: Work with influential religious leaders to promote democratic values (Huntington, 1991).

9.9 Logistical Issues in Nationwide Voting

Organizing a large-scale referendum may face logistical hurdles.

Mitigations:

Decentralized Voting Options: Use secure digital voting and local polling to streamline logistics (Norris, 2011).
Collaborate with Local and International Observers: Involve trusted bodies to enhance transparency and credibility (Diamond & Plattner, 2010).

9.10 Corruption Risks in Interim Governance

Temporary control could lead to corruption.

Mitigations:

Anti-Corruption Oversight: Establish independent bodies to monitor activities and enforce transparency (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012).
Enforce Accountability: Swift repercussions for corruption to set standards for integrity (Norris, 2011).

9.11 Media Control and Information Warfare

Manipulation of information could skew public perception during the transition.

Mitigations:
- Free Press Protections: Safeguard independent media and ensure diverse viewpoints (Diamond and Plattner 2014).
- Cybersecurity Measures: Strengthen digital infrastructure to resist disinformation campaigns (Tufekci 2017).

9.12 Legal Uncertainty and Institutional Inertia

Existing legal frameworks and institutional resistance might slow reforms.

Mitigations:
- Legal Reform Programs: Prioritize updating laws and regulations to align with democratic principles (O’Donnell, Schmitter, and Whitehead 1986).
- Institutional Capacity Building: Invest in training and structural reforms to overcome inertia (R. D. Putnam 2000).

Chapter 10: Discussion & Conclusion

The roadmap for Iran’s democratic transition outlines a structured approach, addressing both domestic priorities and international interests, which could strategically benefit global stakeholders, including the United States, China, Israel, and Europe. Beyond fostering internal reform, this plan envisions pathways to regional stability, security, and economic integration, aligning with key foreign policy objectives.

10.1 Domestic Stability through Inclusive Engagement

A critical aspect of the transition plan is its commitment to inclusive engagement, involving political factions, civil society, business elites, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (Sepah) in a phased and participatory approach. By directly addressing these power structures, the plan promotes consensus-building and trust—both essential for minimizing resistance and ensuring a peaceful transfer of power. This emphasis on inclusivity reflects lessons from democratization studies, demonstrating the importance of involving all societal sectors to foster a stable transition. Responding to public calls for reform, exemplified by movements like the Green Movement and “Women, Life, Freedom,” the plan prioritizes transparency and public participation to resonate with Iran’s diverse population, laying a foundation for enduring governance.

The trajectory of Syria’s conflict underscores that without weakening or fracturing state institutions, efforts to topple an authoritarian regime may devolve into protracted civil war (Chaney 2012). The proposed Iranian roadmap differs significantly by advocating negotiations with existing power centers (including the armed forces) instead of military confrontation. This approach aims to reduce the necessity of violent confrontation that characterized Syria’s conflict. However, the ultimate success of this plan still depends on whether Iranian elites choose negotiation over force. If the regime remains unified and uncompromising, the likelihood of a peaceful transition diminishes, highlighting that strategic divisions and willingness to negotiate within power structures are essential prerequisites for avoiding a Syrian-style outcome.

Additionally, the renewed calls for negotiation with the United States following the 2025 inauguration in Washington indicate that domestic stakeholders (including certain political elites and civil society groups) may view external engagement as a pragmatic route out of economic isolation. If a broad-based transition roadmap offers credible assurances—both to domestic elites wary of foreign interference and to international actors seeking regional de-escalation—this alignment of interests could reinforce the prospects of a negotiated and peaceful democratization process.

10.2 Strategic Benefits for Global Powers

For global stakeholders, a stable, democratic Iran could reduce regional tensions, curb support for proxy conflicts, and bolster non-proliferation efforts. A cooperative Iran could enable joint security initiatives, easing defense burdens and enhancing counter-terrorism strategies, particularly for the U.S., China, Israel, and Europe. Additionally, Iran’s transition to a transparent and cooperative nuclear policy would align with international non-proliferation goals, reducing nuclear risks in the region and supporting long-term stability. By examining international support’s role in other transitions, this plan incorporates a diplomatic framework that integrates Iran into regional security arrangements, fostering sustainable peace.

10.3 Economic Incentives and Human Rights

An economically stable, open Iran could benefit the global market by providing energy security to China and Europe and expanding investment opportunities internationally. The proposed constitution, emphasizing human rights and inclusivity, aligns Iran with democratic values, enhancing its soft power and promoting governance models that respect personal freedoms and social equity. Drawing from global examples, the plan integrates human rights and legal frameworks to strengthen institutional trust and civic engagement within Iran, aligning with international democratic standards and offering an economic and ethical alignment beneficial to both Iran and its global partners.

10.4 Securing International Engagement

Securing international support is vital to the success of Iran’s transition. Phased sanction relief, targeted economic aid, and diplomatic backing from global powers could reinforce Iran’s democratic progress by fostering public trust and ensuring that the interim government has the necessary resources for economic stabilization and reform implementation. This phased approach, informed by successful democratization models, recognizes the need for both internal and external incentives to sustain momentum and provide economic relief, easing the transition’s challenges.

10.5 Conclusion

The proposed roadmap for Iran’s peaceful democratic transition offers a comprehensive framework addressing both Iran’s internal complexities and the strategic interests of international stakeholders. By emphasizing inclusive participation, reconciliation, and the rule of law, this plan aims to foster a collaborative and sustainable shift in governance. The roadmap integrates a diverse coalition, including political factions, civil society, business elites, and key military entities such as the Iranian Army (Artesh) and the IRGC (Sepah), reducing resistance and ensuring a stable transition.

For Iran, this transition represents a historic opportunity to establish a government that respects human rights, fosters economic growth, and aligns with the aspirations of its people. By building trust and stability, the proposed democratic constitution addresses longstanding grievances and promotes a governance model rooted in equity, accountability, and transparency, reflecting the lessons learned from successful transitions worldwide.

From a global perspective, a stable, democratic Iran would contribute to regional and international security, reduce risks associated with nuclear proliferation, and support economic integration. Active international support—including phased economic aid, diplomatic recognition, and structured sanctions relief—can further solidify Iran’s transition and enhance the potential for a cooperative Middle East.

Recent events—such as the partial neutralization of Iranian proxies and increasing public criticism of the regime in online forums—suggest a transitional juncture. While a weakened proxy network may reduce Iran’s leverage abroad, it can also incentivize segments of the ruling elite to seek a diplomatic resolution to sanctions and economic pressures. Combined with new voices within Iran calling for U.S. engagement post-2025, these factors could create an environment more receptive to the roadmap’s proposals. However, the success of any transition still hinges on meaningful domestic negotiations that address entrenched power structures and incorporate genuine public participation, ensuring that future governance aligns with the evolving aspirations of the Iranian people

In summary, this roadmap envisions not only a democratic Iran but also a foundation for a more secure, prosperous, and integrated regional landscape. The proposed plan advances a vision that serves both Iran’s aspirations and the broader interests of the global community, highlighting Iran’s role as a stabilizing force within the Middle East.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work, the author used OpenAI’s ChatGPT, in order to enhance the clarity and cohesion of the manuscript. The tool assisted in translation, refining language, and improving the overall readability and presentation of the content. After using this tool/service, the author reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Bibliography

Acemoglu, Daron, and James A Robinson. 2013. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Currency.

ACRP. 2024. “A Fragile but Enduring Truce in Yemen .” https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/a-fragile-but-enduring-truce-in-yemen/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Adler, Glenn, and Eddie Webster. 1995. “Challenging Transition Theory: The Labor Movement, Radical Reform, and Transition to Democracy in South Africa.” Politics & Society 23 (1): 75–106.

Alamdari, Kazem. 2005. “The Power Structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Transition from Populism to Clientelism, and Militarization of the Government.” Third World Quarterly 26 (8): 1285–1301.

Al-Jubori, Sabah Muhammed Saleh. 2017. “” The Role of External Factor in the Democratic Transformation Process (The Arab Spring Countries as a Model) “.” Tikrit Journal For Political Science 3 (11). Tikrit University: 262–92.

Andreas, S. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 46.

Ansari, AM. 2019. Iran, Islam and Democracy: The Politics of Managing Change. Gingko Library.

Åslund, A. 2002. Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc. Cambridge University Press.

Bayat, A. 2013. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford University Press.

Bielasiak, Jack. 2010. “The Paradox of Solidarity’s Legacy: Contested Values in Poland’s Transitional Politics.” Nationalities Papers 38 (1). Cambridge University Press: 41–58.

Boyte, HC. 2004. Everyday Politics: Reconnecting Citizens and Public Life. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Buchta, W. 2000. Who Rules Iran? Washington Inst. for Near East Policy & Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Byman, Daniel, Seth G. Jones, and Alexander Palmer. 2024. “Escalating to War between Israel, Hezbollah, and Iran.”

Chaney, Eric. 2012. “Democratic Change in the Arab World, Past and Present.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2012 (1). Johns Hopkins University Press: 363–414.

Chehabi, H.E. 1991. “Religion and Politics in Iran: How Theocratic Is the Islamic Republic?” Daedalus, 69–91.

Chehabi, HE, and JJ Linz. 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. JHU Press.

Dabiri, Arastoo. 2023. “‘Woman, Life, Freedom’: A Movement in Progress in Iran.” Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence 8 (1). University of Rhode Island: 5.

Dawisha, A. 2013. Iraq: A Political History. Princeton University Press.

Diamond, L. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.

———. 2015. In Search of Democracy. In Search of Democracy. Routledge.

Diamond, L, and MF Plattner. 2014. Democratization and Authoritarianism in the Arab World. JHU Press.

Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1999. “Chile 1997–1998: The Revenge of Incomplete Democratization.” International Affairs 75 (2). Oxford Academic: 259–67.

Gheissari, A, and SVR Nasr. 2009. Democracy in Iran: History and the Quest for Liberty. Oxford University Press.

Ghobadzadeh, N. 2014. Religious Secularity: A Theological Challenge to the Islamic State. Oxford University Press.

Ghorashi, H. 2003. Ways to Survive, Battles to Win: Iranian Women Exiles in the Netherlands and United States. Nova Publishers.

Ginsburg, Tom, Zachary Elkins, and Justin Blount. 2009. “Does the Process of Constitution-Making Matter?” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5 (1): 201–23.

Hafezi, Parisa. 2025. “Iran Is Willing to Give Trump Diplomacy ‘Another Chance’, Senior Iranian Official Says | Reuters.” Reuters Press. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-is-willing-give-trump-diplomacy-another-chance-senior-iranian-official-says-2025-02-05/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Hakimzadeh, S. 2006. “Iran: A Vast Diaspora Abroad and Millions of Refugees at Home.” Migration Information Source 4 (1).

Hamber, B. 2009. Transforming Societies after Political Violence: Truth, Reconciliation, and Mental Health. Springer.

Higley, J, and MG Burton. 1989. “The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions and Breakdowns.” American Sociological Review, 17–32.

Horowits, D.L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. University of California Press.

Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave. Classes and Elites in Democracy and Democratization. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Hussain, Ejaz. 2021. “The Belt and Road Initiative and the Middle Corridor: Complementarity or Competition?” Insight Turkey 23 (3). SETA Foundation: 233–50.

IRBC. 2015. “Iran: Government Surveillance Capacity and Control, Including Media Censorship and Surveillance of Individual Internet Activity.” https://webarchive.archive.unhcr.org/20230525134341/https://www.refworld.org/docid/550fdcc34.html.

Izadi, D, and S Dryden. 2024. “Woman/Life/Freedom: The Social Semiotics behind the 2022 Iranian Protest Movement.” Discourse, Context & Media 60.

Kadivar, MA. 2021. Popular Politics and the Path to Durable Democracy. Princeton University Press.

Keshavarzian, A. 2007. Bazaar and State in Iran: The Politics of the Tehran Marketplace. Cambridge University Press.

Khatam, Azam. 2023. “Mahsa Amini’s Killing, State Violence, and Moral Policing in Iran.” Human Geography 16 (3). SAGE Publications Inc.: 299–306.

Khosravi, S. 2017. After Deportation: Ethnographic Perspectives. Springer.

Kibble, Steve, Paul Goodison, and Balefi Tsie. 1995. “The Uneasy Triangle – South Africa, Southern Africa and Europe in the Post-Apartheid Era.” International Relations 12 (4). Sage PublicationsSage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA: 41–61.

Kinowska-Mazaraki, Zofia. 2021. “The Polish Paradox: From a Fight for Democracy to the Political Radicalization and Social Exclusion.” Social Sciences Journal 10 (3). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.

Krasner, S. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.

Levitsky, S, and MV Murillo. 2005. Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness. Penn State Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uvxGrSeK9b0C&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=Levitsky,+S.,+%26+Murillo,+M.+V.+(2005).+Argentine+democracy:+The+politics+of+institutional+weakness.+Penn+State+University+Press.&ots=X02B9NYwz0&sig=wI-UG_zjLe3SVf54VApRHrkyOIA.

Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.

Lopes, Ana Maria D´Ávila, and Isabelle Maria Campos Vasconcelos Chehab. 2015. “AN ANALYSIS ABOUT THE TRANSITION FROM THE MILITARY DICTATORSHIP TO DEMOCRACY IN CHILE.” Revista de Teorias Da Democracia e Direitos Políticos 1 (1). Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito – CONPEDI: 82–105.

Mahmood, S. 2024. “Israel’s Three-Front Conflict with Iran, Gaza, and Lebanon: A Political Analysis.” International Policy Digest.

Naficy, H. 1993. The Making of Exile Cultures: Iranian Television in Los Angeles. Routledge.

———. 2012. A Social History of Iranian Cinema, Volume 4. A Social History of Iranian Cinema, Volume 4. Duke University Press.

Navia, Patricio. 2010. “Living in Actually Existing Democracies: Democracy to the Extent Possible in Chile.” Latin American Research Review 45 (4). Latin American Studies Association: 298–328.

NCSL. 2024. “Initiative and Referendum Processes.” https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/initiative-and-referendum-processes?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Norris, P. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.

O’Donnell, G, PC Schmitter, and L Whitehead. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. JHU Press.

Parsa, M. 2016. Democracy in Iran: Why It Failed and How It Might Succeed. Harvard University Press.

Petrova, Tsveta. 2012. “How Poland Promotes Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 23 (2). Johns Hopkins University Press: 133–47.

Putnam, RD. 1994. “Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.”

Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Books.Google.Com. Simon Schuster.

Qvortrup, Matt, and Leah Trueblood. 2023. “The Case for Supermajority Requirements in Referendums.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 21 (1). Oxford Academic: 187–204. doi:10.1093/ICON/MOAD013.

Rahimi, B. 2011. “The Agonistic Social Media: Cyberspace in the Formation of Dissent and Consolidation of State Power in Postelection Iran.” The Communication Reveiw 14 (3): 158–78.

Rodrik, D. 2000. “Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (3). Transaction Periodicals Consortium: 3–31.

Rose-Ackerman, S. 2007. International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Saeidi, Ali A. 2004. “The Accountability of Para-Governmental Organizations ( Bonyads ): The Case of Iranian Foundations.” Iranian Studies 37 (3). Cambridge University Press (CUP): 479–98.

Sagan, Scott. 2011. “„Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?”.” Security Studies, 222–29.

Saltzer, J. H., D. P. Reed, and D. D. Clark. 1984. “End-to-End Arguments in System Design.” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 2 (4): <span class=”nowrap”>277-</span>288.

Saraswat, Deepika. 2024. “Hamas–Israel War and the Evolution of Iran’s ‘Resistance Geopolitics.’” Strategic Analysis 48 (1). Routledge: 60–65.

Saunders, Christopher. 2004. “Perspectives on the Transition from Apartheid to Democracy in South Africa.” South African Historical Journal 51. Routledge: 159–66.

Shahin, Y. 1999. “Marketing the American Creed Abroad: Diasporas in the US and Thier Homelands.” Cir.Nii.Ac.Jp.

Shaterabadi, Mohammad, Mehdi Ahmadi Jirdehi, and Nima Amiri. 2022. “Impact of Fuel Price Increasing Policies on Fuel Smuggling and Acceptance of Green Cars: A Case Study of Iran.” The Journal of Engineering 2022 (12). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: 1239–48.

Silver, Laura, Moira Fagan, Christine Haung, and Laura Clancy. 2024. “Electoral Reform and Direct Democracy.” https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/03/13/electoral-reform-and-direct-democracy/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Skaar, E, J García-Godos, and C Collins. 2016. Transitional Justice in Latin America: The Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability. Routledge.

Sparks, A. 1994. Tomorrow Is Another Country: The inside Story of South Africa’s Negotiated Revolution. Sandton.

Takeyh, R. 2009. Guardians of the Revolution: Iran and the World in the Age of the Ayatollahs. Oxford University Press.

Toit, Fanie du. 2017. “A Broken Promise? Evaluating South Africa’s Reconciliation Process Twenty Years on.” International Political Science Review 38 (2). SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England: 169–84.

Tufekci, Z. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.

UK Electoral Commission. 2024. “Maintaining the Integrity and Security of the Election | Electoral Commission.” UK Electoral Commission. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/guidance-returning-officers-administering-local-government-elections-england/planning-election/maintaining-integrity-and-security-election?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Wright, TC. 2007. State Terrorism in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and International Human Rights. Rowman & Littlefield. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ztjV7GVNeiAC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=+Chilean+exiles+and+the+international+struggle+for+human+rights.+Latin+American+Perspectives,+25(4),+20-38.&ots=7iV2gUn2Ix&sig=ecWcRjsk96P_gMVrcMrb4bRiZmw.

Wyk, Jo Ansie van. 2019. “From Apartheid to Ubuntu: Transition, Transaction and Transformation in South Africa’s Post-Apartheid Foreign Ministry.” South African Journal of International Affairs 26 (3). Routledge: 413–34.

Zgurić, Borna. 2012. “Challenges for Democracy in Countries Affected by the ‘Arab Spring.’” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 23 (4). Routledge: 417–34.